'No one may be refused emergency medical treatment' - ethical dilemmas in South African emergency medicine
Efraim Benjamin Kramer
The Constitution of South Africa enshrines that no person may be refused emergency medical treatment. Unfortunately, the definition of a medical emergency ireamins unclear after Consitutional Court deliberations and as such may have profound practical implications in the enactment of this right to medical treatment. Similarly, there is no recognised defintion of what emergency medical treatment entails and what any patient in such a situation can be expected to receive, further complicating the unethical practice of redirecting patients away from emergency departments to other health care establishments under the guise of the Department of Health's system of hierarchy of servcies.
Efraim Benjamin Kramer, Univeristy of Witwatersrand
emergency medicine, ethics, emergency triage
Cite this article
South African Journal of Bioethics and Law 2008;1(2):53.
Date submitted: 2008-03-28
Date published: 2008-12-12
Abstract views: 9789
Full text views: 15084
Comments on this article*Read our policy for posting comments here
"newci ci" (2018-07-14)
"João Kambuski" (2018-09-25)