Articles

Incentives for HIV testing at the workplace in the automotive industry in the Nelson Mandela Bay Municipality: Ethical considerations

Martin Weihs, Anna Meyer-Weitz, Friederike Baasner-Weihs

Abstract


Comprehensive HIV and AIDS workplace programmes made use of substantial lottery incentives in HIV counselling and testing drives to promote HIV testing at four companies in the automotive industry in the Nelson Mandela Bay Municipality. The main aim was to use lottery incentives to increase uptake for HIV testing. This would help to define company HIV prevalence and ensure timely support, care and treatment of employees. In total, 1 324 employees, making up about 90% of the total staff, were tested for HIV in the four companies during wellness testing days. In order to gain an understanding of employees’ experiences of the lotteries as part of the HIV counselling and testing drive, quantitative data were collected among a total of 414 employees, and 17 interviews were conducted in the four companies. In this article, we investigate the issue of whether the lotteries unduly influenced the employees’ participation in workplace HIV testing, and an approach to resolving an identified ethical dilemma is presented. The ethical question as to whether lottery incentives contribute to undue coercion was explored using both a utilitarian and a deontological approach. The analysis concluded that the use of lotteries to encourage HIV testing in the workplaces of the automotive industry in the Nelson Mandela Bay Municipality can be deemed morally acceptable.


Authors' affiliations

Martin Weihs, Human Sciences Research Council (HSRC), Social Aspects of HIV/AIDS Research Alliance (SAHARA) and HIV/AIDS, Sexually Transmitted Infections and TB (HAST),

Anna Meyer-Weitz, University of KwaZulu-Natal, School of Applied Human Sciences

Friederike Baasner-Weihs, Nelson Mandela Metropolitan University, HIV/AIDS Research Unit

Full Text

PDF (110KB)

Keywords

Incentives; HIV; testing; workplace;

Cite this article

South African Journal of Bioethics and Law 2017;10(1):11-14. DOI:10.7196/sajbl.531

Article History

Date submitted: 2017-02-03
Date published: 2017-07-03

Article Views

Abstract views: 1811
Full text views: 919

Comments on this article

*Read our policy for posting comments here
View all comments